Title: Desiatnyk V
Author: Admin
Last saved by: User
Company: Grizli777

Desiatnyk V. The Problem of Dialectical Logic

The article consists of an introduction, two chapters and conclusions.
The introduction contains the statement of problem of dialectical logic, setting out the attitude of modern Ukrainian legal science to the problem and the definition of the goal of the research.
The Section 1 "Kant’s antirationalism and Hegel's dialectics" involves the description of K.Popper’s explanation that Hegel has overcome Kant’s refutation of rationalism with the help of created by him dialectical logic, that is, he offered to ignore the contradictions.
The Section 2 "Basic elements of Hegel’s dialectics" consists of three subsections.
The first subsection "Dialectical opposition to Kant’s antyratsionalizm" deals with Popper’s point of view on Hegel’s method that promotes Hegel's system to be invulnerable to any criticism and, thus, is dogmatic.
The second subsection "Dangerous involvement of dialectics to logic" deals with the description of K. Popper’s explanation that the main threat of identification of dialectics with logic consists in teaching people dogmatic behavior during a discussion; dialecticians, with logical difficulties,  inform their opponents that their criticism is wrong, because it is based on the ordinary logic, but not dialectics, and once they only apply dialectics, they realize, that dialectical contradictions, noticed by them in some arguments, are quite legitimate ( namely, lawful from the dialectical point of view). 
The third subsection "Application of dialectics to the "world at large" of the annotated research, Popper, summarizing his famous article "What is dialectics?" (1940), believes that Hegel’s philosophy and particularly the philosophy of identity, is the worst of all absurd and incredible philosophic theories. We clearly understand this, Popper says, we should only consider any similar argument, for example: "Why can the mirror reflect my face?" - "Because it looks like my face." Although the complete uselessness of this kind of argument is obvious, all people repeat and repeat it. It is sad and instructive to observe, Popper writes, how the Hegel "Logic" is recommended as the basis of the scientific methodology - not just outdated, but the one that represents by itself a typical example of pre-scientific thinking and even pre-logical thinking.
Instead, the modern Ukrainian jurisprudence till nowadays: (1) explains that in the "Science of Logic" Hegel reflects the movement of thought by acts, resolving contradictions of paired categories, as universal forms of thought and generalization of the real world; (2) states that dialectics received the greatest development in the Hegel's philosophical system, according to which the dialectics is understood as a method for finding and resolving of contradictions, which are contained in concepts. (3) describes the logic that in conjunction with law, becoming a legal logic, form right, sells it and the whole logic of rights is, dialectical logic of law manifests itself as a fundamental logical constant legal knowledge and hence overall development rights. So, following the logic of Hegel's dialectic, Ukrainian jurisprudence, however, correctly points out that no law of formal logic fails.
Conclusions. Convincing criticism of Popper and other researchers of Hegel’s ideas of dialectical logic, that rejects the law of the consistency of formal logic, is stated in the annotated article.
Such criticism of Hegel's dialectical logic within the basic methodological concepts of critical legal thinking, the author put forward in the annotated article, may be promising for further in-depth research to rethink its adequacy as a methodology of modern Ukrainian legal science.
Keywords: dialectical logic, law of consistency, formal logic, criticism, controversy.